Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- Why a “Judge” Matters More Than You Think
- Meet Sam Hamilton: A Career Built on Taste (and Work Ethic)
- March: The Store That Trains Your Eye (Whether You Asked It To or Not)
- The 2017 Considered Design Awards: What They Were Judging
- What Sam Hamilton Likely Looked For in 2017 Submissions
- Examples From 2017 Winners: What “Considered” Looked Like
- How To Design (and Submit) With a Judge Like Sam Hamilton in Mind
- Beyond 2017: Why Hamilton’s Taste Still Resonates
- Conclusion: The Sam Hamilton Way to Think About “Best”
- Experience Notes: What It Feels Like To Design for a 2017 Awards Judge Like Sam Hamilton
- SEO Tags
Some people walk into a room and notice the chandelier. Others notice the light. A rare few notice
why the light makes the room feel calmer (and why that calm is doing more heavy lifting than the chandelier ever will).
In 2017, the Considered Design Awards brought together judges who live for that kind of nuancepeople
who can spot “timeless” from three blocks away and “trendy” from a single brass drawer pull.
One of those judges was Sam Hamilton, founder of the San Francisco shop Marcha store that’s famous
for making everyday objects (a bowl, a cutting board, a worktable) feel like the beginning of a better life.
Not a dramatic better life. Not a “move-to-Tuscany-and-start-a-goat-farm” better life. A realistic better life:
one where your kitchen tools work, your table is inviting, and your home looks like it belongs to an actual human.
This is the story of 2017 Awards Judge: Sam Hamiltonwhere her eye came from, what she likely valued at the judging table,
and how designers (and regular people with extraordinary homes) can learn to think more “considered.”
Why a “Judge” Matters More Than You Think
Awards are not just glitter cannons for architects and interior designers. They’re culture-shapers. A judge’s tasteespecially a judge
with a strong point of viewquietly teaches the rest of us what “good” looks like. Not “expensive.” Not “Instagrammable.” Just… good.
The Considered Design Awards were built around that exact idea: rewarding spaces and objects that are thoughtful, functional, and
genuinely livable. And if you’ve ever been in March (or even fallen down an internet rabbit hole about it), you know Hamilton’s whole brand
is basically: Let’s make everyday life beautiful without making it precious.
Meet Sam Hamilton: A Career Built on Taste (and Work Ethic)
Hamilton’s design sensibility didn’t arrive fully formed like a Greek goddess stepping out of sea foam. It was builtlayer by layeracross
fashion, art history, food, retail, and interiors.
From fashion heritage to “objects with a past”
Early in her career, Hamilton worked at Ralph Lauren in New York. That matters because Ralph Lauren is basically a masterclass in
visual storytellingheritage references, layering eras, and creating a world where everything looks like it’s been loved for decades (even if it
was manufactured yesterday). If you’ve ever wondered why Hamilton gravitates toward pieces that feel grounded and enduring, that background is a clue.
Art history brain, food-culture heart
Hamilton studied art history (and, by her own account in interviews, developed an eye for proportion and visual language along the way).
Later, she leaned into food culturetaking cooking classes in New York and then interning at Chez Panisse after moving to San Francisco.
That experience matters because it’s hard to spend time around ingredient-first cooking and not start caring about sourcing, craft, and the
quiet perfection of simple things done well.
Put all of that together and you get the Hamilton throughline: heritage + function + restraint. In other words: a judge who’s not impressed by
a room that’s trying too hard.
March: The Store That Trains Your Eye (Whether You Asked It To or Not)
March opened in the early 2000s on Sacramento Street in San Francisco and evolved over time. Early on, the shop was known for large-scale
contemporary and antique furniture imported from Europehigh-design pieces often aimed at the trade.
Later, Hamilton reimagined March around the kitchen, pantry, and tableareas where daily life happens, where “good design” either helps you
or gets in your way.
A kitchen in the middle of a design store is a statement
March famously leaned into the idea of the kitchen as a lived-in hub. The store displayed an AGA cooker and used it for demosnot because
retail needed more cooking theater, but because Hamilton wanted customers to understand how objects behave in real life. This is classic March:
beauty with proof-of-work.
Minimal display, maximum conviction
Hamilton’s merchandising style has often been described as spare in the best waymore gallery than cluttered boutique. The result is that every
object has to earn its place. When you’re surrounded by that level of editing every day, you become allergic to “meh.” That’s exactly the kind of
allergy you want in an awards judge.
Worktables, not monoliths
March’s collaboration with furniture maker Matt Bear (Union Studio) produced kitchen worktables designed as alternatives to the “monolithic”
kitchen islandlighter in presence, more flexible, and intentionally shaped like furniture you actually want to gather around. The worktable idea
is a perfect symbol of Hamilton’s values: human-scaled, functional, and quietly handsome.
The 2017 Considered Design Awards: What They Were Judging
In 2017, the Considered Design Awards (associated with design sites including Remodelista and Gardenista) invited submissions across a wide range of
categoriesfrom kitchens and baths to gardens, home offices, and outdoor living. Winners were selected by a judging panel, and a People’s Choice component
added public voting to the mix.
Categories, but make them “real life”
What made the awards feel different was the framing: these weren’t just photogenic rooms. The emphasis was on considered decisionsmaterials,
layouts, storage, longevity, and how a space supports the way people actually live.
A judge lineup that signals the vibe
In addition to Hamilton, the 2017 judge list included major design-world names such as Deborah Needleman, Rita Konig, David Kleinberg, and Sheila Bridges.
Translation: not a panel of people who get excited by “statement wallpaper” alone. This was a group tuned to composition, craft, restraint, and
a certain kind of confidencerooms that don’t have to shout.
What Sam Hamilton Likely Looked For in 2017 Submissions
Judges never publish a secret rubric titled “How to Win My Heart (Design Edition).” But Hamilton has been unusually candid in interviews about her style
and philosophy. Put those statements next to the nature of the awards, and a pattern appears.
1) Timelessness that’s earned, not declared
Hamilton has described her approach in terms of heritage and “everyday objects” that hold timeless beauty. That tends to translate into:
honest materials, classic forms, and details that age wellrather than designs that depend on a trend staying popular.
2) A mix of styles that feels lived-in (not random)
She’s also talked about mixing styles and periods as what makes a space “come to life.” That doesn’t mean throwing in one vintage chair as a personality coupon.
It means making thoughtful contrasts: old + new, refined + rough, matte + shine, sculptural + utilitarianso the space feels collected over time.
3) Function that doesn’t kill the mood
March is full of objects that work hard while looking calm. So a Hamilton-approved room is likely one where storage is solved elegantly,
circulation makes sense, and you can imagine actual tasks happening there (cooking, bathing, working, hanging out) without the design getting offended.
4) Craft and sourcing with a pulse
Hamilton’s world is rich with artisans: hand-forged knives, locally made pantry goods, furniture collaborations. That background makes a judge more sensitive
to qualityespecially when a design features handmade components, thoughtful sourcing, or details that show the maker’s hand.
A quick “Hamilton-leaning” self-check
- Would you still love this in 10 years? If not, why are you asking a judge to love it now?
- Can you explain the material choices? Not “because it’s pretty,” but because it performs.
- Is there one strong idea? Great rooms don’t have seven competing “moments.”
- Does it feel human? The best design has dignity, not drama.
Examples From 2017 Winners: What “Considered” Looked Like
The 2017 winners spanned homes, gardens, and interiors. You don’t need the full gallery to learn from themjust the kinds of decisions they represent:
clever use of space, memorable restraint, and strong, simple concepts executed well.
Best Kitchen: “Boys’ Kitchen” (Zachery Leung)
Kitchens win when they combine clarity and warmthfunctional zones, practical finishes, and a visual story that doesn’t feel like a showroom.
A judge like Hamilton would likely respond to the “workhorse” quality: where the kitchen is genuinely built to be used, and still feels cohesive.
Best Small Bath: “Glen Park Powder Room” (CCS Architecture)
Small baths are where bad decisions go to hide. Great ones feel intentional: scaled lighting, materials that can take a beating, and a design concept
strong enough to carry the tiny footprint. Considered design here is about restraintchoosing fewer elements, better.
Best Outdoor Living Space: “Sausalito Living” (Landsystems Landscapes)
Outdoor spaces that win tend to behave like roomsdefined edges, comfortable scale, and materials that weather with grace. If you’re submitting outdoor work
to a Hamilton-style judge, show how the space supports daily rituals: cooking, sitting, gathering, moving through the landscape.
Best Use of Small Space: “Cottages and Bungalows” (Toss Designs)
This category is basically a test of editorial skill. Judges want to see if you can solve real constraints without making the space feel like a compromise.
That’s very March: make the practical beautiful.
Other 2017 category winners included projects like “Weekend House” (Best Bedroom), “The Barn” (Best Home Office), and a range of standout gardens and home
exteriorseach reflecting a core award theme: design that works, and design that lasts.
How To Design (and Submit) With a Judge Like Sam Hamilton in Mind
If you wanted to impress a judge like Hamilton in 2017and if you want to impress her aesthetic todaythe strategy is surprisingly unglamorous.
It’s about clarity, honesty, and execution.
Tell a simple story
- What was the problem? “No storage, awkward circulation, no light.”
- What was the idea? “Turn the kitchen into a calm workroom; create a table-centered layout.”
- What choices prove it? “Durable surfaces, edited palette, heritage forms, artisan touches.”
Photograph function, not just glamour
Yes, you need a hero shot. But you also need proof: the drawer that actually fits the pots, the walkway that’s not a shoulder-check obstacle course,
the countertop that can survive a toddler’s jam phase. Considered design shows in how a space behaves.
Use materials like you mean it
Judges who care about longevity notice when materials are chosen for performance. They also notice when “fancy” finishes are doing too much.
A Hamilton-adjacent palette often looks calm: whites, woods, natural stone, iron, hand-thrown ceramicsthen one sharp element to keep it awake.
Let one object carry the personality
March is full of “anchor objects”: a worktable, a knife, a bowl, a cabinet. The principle works in interiors too. Pick one piece that has soul (vintage,
handmade, inherited, or simply beautifully made), then let the rest of the room support it.
Beyond 2017: Why Hamilton’s Taste Still Resonates
Hamilton’s influence extends beyond judging. March helped define a modern kind of American “quiet luxury” before that phrase became a fashion headline:
beautiful objects, fewer of them, and a relentless focus on what lasts.
Goop Test Kitchen: “homey, not sterile”
In one notable collaboration, Hamilton worked with Goop on a test kitchen conceptexplicitly aiming to avoid the sterile feeling that test kitchens can have.
She described wanting the kitchen to feel personal and “homey,” like a friend introducing you to something. That’s essentially the thesis of the Considered Design Awards:
design with humanity.
A beloved shopand the reality of modern retail
March became an institution in San Francisco design culture. And like many independent retailers, it also faced the hard economics of modern shopping.
(Even the best taste in the world can’t negotiate with the internet at 2 a.m.)
Conclusion: The Sam Hamilton Way to Think About “Best”
If you strip away the awards language and the glossy photos, Hamilton’s approach is almost disarmingly simple:
collect what lasts, mix styles thoughtfully, and make the everyday beautiful.
That’s why 2017 Awards Judge: Sam Hamilton made sense. The Considered Design Awards weren’t looking for the loudest room in the feed.
They were looking for the room you’d still love after the algorithm changesagain.
And if you want your work (or your home) to stand up to that kind of scrutiny, you don’t need more stuff. You need better decisions.
Preferably the kind that make your morning coffee feel like a tiny vacation.
500-word experiences add-on
Experience Notes: What It Feels Like To Design for a 2017 Awards Judge Like Sam Hamilton
Designers who submit to awards often describe a weird emotional cocktail: pride, panic, and the sudden urge to repaint an entire room because
the camera “sees things.” When you’re submitting to a panel that includes a judge like Sam Hamiltonsomeone trained by fashion heritage,
refined by food culture, and sharpened by years of curating Marchthe experience tends to get even more specific. It becomes less about
sparkle and more about integrity.
Here’s a composite of what that process feels like (built from common patterns designers report), and why it matters. First, you stop styling
and start editing. The initial instinct is to add: add a throw, add a plant, add a candle, add a bowl of lemons (because we all collectively
agreed lemons mean “lifestyle”). Then you remember: this is a considered design award, not a “most accessories per square foot” contest.
You begin taking things away until the room can hold its own without props. If the space still feels strongif the proportions still work,
if the materials still singyou’re on the right track.
Next comes the functional audit, which is where thoughtful judges quietly separate the winners from the “pretty, but…” entries. You open every
cabinet. You map the cooking path from fridge to sink to stove. You check whether the shower niche is actually reachable without doing yoga.
You notice the tiny decisions you used to ignore: where the hooks go, how the light hits a mirror, whether the work surface is deep enough
to be useful. This is very Hamilton-coded thinkingdesign as something that supports daily life, not a performance that collapses when someone
tries to make toast.
Then there’s the story. Not a dramatic story. A simple one: “Here was the problem; here was our idea; here’s how we proved it.”
When you imagine a judge like Hamilton reading your description, you can almost hear the internal questions: Why this material? Why this form?
Will it last? Does it feel like a human lives here? The most successful entries tend to answer those questions without overexplaining.
They show restraint in language the same way they show restraint in design.
Finally, the surprising part: the process often changes how you design afterward. Even if you don’t win, you start keeping a mental “March filter”
in your head. You begin asking, “Is this object doing real work?” and “Will I still like this when the trend cycle moves on?”
You get braver about mixing old and new because you realize cohesion doesn’t come from matchingit comes from conviction.
That’s the hidden prize of awards judged by people with real point of view: they teach you to make better decisions, even when no one is handing you a trophy.
