Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- Why this happens (and why it’s not always evil)
- 17 movies and shows that echoed lesser-known originals
- 1) The Island (2005) vs. Parts: The Clonus Horror (1979)
- 2) Lockout (2012) vs. Escape from New York (1981)
- 3) A Fistful of Dollars (1964) vs. Yojimbo (1961)
- 4) Star Wars (1977) vs. The Hidden Fortress (1958)
- 5) The Terminator (1984) vs. The Outer Limits episode “Soldier” (1964)
- 6) The Lion King (1994) vs. Kimba the White Lion (1960s)
- 7) The Hunger Games (2012) vs. Battle Royale (2000)
- 8) Black Swan (2010) vs. Perfect Blue (1997)
- 9) Inception (2010) vs. Paprika (2006)
- 10) The Matrix (1999) vs. Ghost in the Shell (1995)
- 11) The Departed (2006) vs. Infernal Affairs (2002)
- 12) The Ring (2002) vs. Ringu (1998)
- 13) 12 Monkeys (1995) vs. La Jetée (1962)
- 14) Three Men and a Baby (1987) vs. Three Men and a Cradle (1985)
- 15) Reservoir Dogs (1992) vs. City on Fire (1987)
- 16) Stranger Things (2016–) vs. Montauk (2012 short) and the “Montauk” concept
- 17) The Shape of Water (2017) vs. Let Me Hear You Whisper (1969 play)
- How to tell homage from copycat
- Conclusion
- Bonus: 500-ish words of real-life viewer experiences with movie “déjà vu”
Ever had the cinematic version of déjà vuwhere a “brand-new” blockbuster hits the screen and your brain goes,
“Hold up… haven’t I seen this exact thing… but with a smaller budget and way fewer merch opportunities?”
Welcome to the wild gray zone where inspiration, homage, remake culture, and “uh-oh, that’s awfully specific” all
share a popcorn bucket.
To be clear: storytelling has patterns. There are only so many ways to stage a heist, crash a romance, or unleash
a monster. But sometimes the overlap isn’t just a vibeit’s a blueprint. Below are 17 movies and shows that were
widely compared to (or legally tangled with) lesser-known books, foreign films, anime, shorts, and indie projects.
Some are official remakes. Some are “influenced by.” And some are the kind of similar that makes you want to
check the credits like you’re auditing the IRS.
Why this happens (and why it’s not always evil)
Hollywood runs on risk management. Familiar premises are easier to pitch, finance, market, and explain in a
12-second trailer voiceover. Meanwhile, smaller worksespecially foreign films, short films, and niche novelscan
be a gold mine: strong concepts with lower mainstream visibility. Sometimes creators buy rights and do it properly.
Sometimes they borrow “just enough.” And sometimes a court gets involved and everyone suddenly becomes a huge fan
of the phrase “substantial similarity.”
17 movies and shows that echoed lesser-known originals
1) The Island (2005) vs. Parts: The Clonus Horror (1979)
A pristine facility. Residents dreaming of a better life. A horrifying truth: they exist as “spare parts” for the
wealthy. The parallels between The Island and the cult indie Clonus were so loud they spilled into
court, with the older film’s creators alleging infringement. Even if you’ve never heard of Clonus, this is a
classic example of a small premise getting a big-budget glow-up.
2) Lockout (2012) vs. Escape from New York (1981)
One tough antihero. One high-stakes rescue. One confined, dangerous “no rules” environment. Lockout drew
heavy comparisons to John Carpenter’s Escape from New York, and the dispute didn’t stay theoreticalcourts
weighed in on whether it crossed the line. This pairing is a reminder that “same setup, different jokes” can still
look a lot like copying when the skeleton matches.
3) A Fistful of Dollars (1964) vs. Yojimbo (1961)
A drifter arrives in a town controlled by rival factions and plays both sides for maximum chaos (and profit).
Today it’s film-history legend, but it’s also a famous case where an “unofficial remake” was treated as more than
a compliment. If you want a clean illustration of how a story can leap culturesand spark ownership questionsthis
is the textbook.
4) Star Wars (1977) vs. The Hidden Fortress (1958)
George Lucas has openly discussed Akira Kurosawa’s influence, and one of the most cited touchpoints is
The Hidden Fortress: a sweeping adventure seen through the perspective of lower-status companions, with
a princess on the run and a general guiding the journey. It’s not “copying” so much as a very successful
translation of classic cinematic grammar into a space opera.
5) The Terminator (1984) vs. The Outer Limits episode “Soldier” (1964)
Time travel. A relentless killer. A hunted human who becomes a symbol. Over the years, The Terminator has
been linked to earlier sci-fi television, particularly The Outer Limits. This is one of those messy “shared
DNA” cases that became industry loreless about a scene-for-scene duplicate and more about how older TV ideas can
resurface as a movie that defines a generation.
6) The Lion King (1994) vs. Kimba the White Lion (1960s)
A young lion. A fall from grace. A return to claim a rightful place. For decades, audiences have compared Disney’s
The Lion King to Osamu Tezuka’s Kimba franchise, citing thematic and visual echoes. The debate is
complicatedshared archetypes existbut this is one of the most famous “did they borrow more than they admit?”
conversations in animation history.
7) The Hunger Games (2012) vs. Battle Royale (2000)
Teenagers forced into a televised fight-to-the-death scenario is… not exactly subtle. The comparisons between
The Hunger Games and Japan’s Battle Royale exploded once Katniss hit the arena. The key difference
is tone and intentone leans YA rebellion narrative, the other is harsher political nightmare fuelbut the premise
overlap is why this pairing never stops coming up.
8) Black Swan (2010) vs. Perfect Blue (1997)
Identity fracture, performance pressure, paranoia, and the horror of being watchedBlack Swan and
Satoshi Kon’s Perfect Blue sit in the same psychological neighborhood. Critics and fans have pointed to
similarities in themes and certain visual choices. Whether you see it as influence, coincidence, or something
spicier depends on your tolerance for “it’s just a vibe” explanations.
9) Inception (2010) vs. Paprika (2006)
Dream technology. Shared subconscious spaces. Reality bending like it’s made of warm taffy. Many viewers have
compared Nolan’s Inception to Kon’s Paprika, even as the films differ in structure and
storytelling goals. This is a good example of how two works can share a central concept but diverge wildly in
toneone a sleek heist, the other a surreal fever dream.
10) The Matrix (1999) vs. Ghost in the Shell (1995)
Cyberpunk philosophy, body-tech identity questions, and sleek action compositions made
Ghost in the Shell a frequent reference point for The Matrix. The Wachowskis have acknowledged
anime as inspiration, and critics have long noted overlaps in aesthetic language. This is influence done at a
grand scale: not “we copied your homework,” more “we built a new project using your math.”
11) The Departed (2006) vs. Infernal Affairs (2002)
Here’s the “approved” version of imitation: The Departed is widely recognized as a remake/adaptation of
Hong Kong’s Infernal Affairs. Same core tensioncop in the mob, mob in the copsdifferent cultural
texture, pacing, and character flavor. If you loved Scorsese’s version, the original is your next must-watch.
12) The Ring (2002) vs. Ringu (1998)
Another official remake where many viewers met the concept through the American version first. The Ring
repackaged Ringu’s cursed-media nightmare for U.S. audiences, leaning into a colder, rain-soaked dread.
It’s proof that “imitated” isn’t always shadysometimes it’s simply translation with a bigger distribution plan.
13) 12 Monkeys (1995) vs. La Jetée (1962)
Terry Gilliam’s time-travel thriller is frequently linked to Chris Marker’s haunting short, La Jetée,
which uses still images to build a sci-fi tragedy about memory and fate. The connection is a great reminder that
“lesser-known” doesn’t mean “less influential”short films and experimental projects often feed the mainstream
more than people realize.
14) Three Men and a Baby (1987) vs. Three Men and a Cradle (1985)
A hit American comedy built on a French foundation. Many moviegoers never realized Three Men and a Baby
was adapted from Trois hommes et un couffin. Same basic setupbachelors suddenly raising a babydifferent
cultural rhythms, humor, and star chemistry. This is “imitation” with paperwork, and it happens constantly.
15) Reservoir Dogs (1992) vs. City on Fire (1987)
A heist gone wrong. An undercover cop. Suspicion, tension, and the sense that everyone’s one bad decision away
from disaster. Ringo Lam’s City on Fire is often cited as a major influence on Tarantino’s debut, with
years of side-by-side comparisons fueling the debate over homage versus appropriation. At minimum, it’s a strong
case for watching the “inspiration” before declaring you’ve seen every great crime story.
16) Stranger Things (2016–) vs. Montauk (2012 short) and the “Montauk” concept
Stranger Things is soaked in ’80s DNA, but it also drew attention for its early “Montauk” originsand for
a lawsuit alleging idea theft from a lesser-known short film titled Montauk. The case became a headline
moment in the streaming era, reminding creators that pitches, meetings, and paper trails matter almost as much as
monsters.
17) The Shape of Water (2017) vs. Let Me Hear You Whisper (1969 play)
Guillermo del Toro’s romantic monster fable faced claims that it resembled an older stage play involving a
lab setting and a captive aquatic creature. The dispute became part of the film’s awards-season conversation,
even as fans argued the movie’s themes and execution were distinct. Regardless of where you land, it’s a perfect
example of how older, niche works can suddenly re-enter public awareness when a big title hits.
How to tell homage from copycat
- Is it a premise or a pipeline? Shared ideas are common; shared sequences, beats, and character functions are louder.
- Does the newer work transform the meaning? A true reinterpretation changes what the story is “about,” not just where it happens.
- Are the credits honest? Adaptations and remakes usually say so. Silence isn’t proofjust a clue.
- Is the older work unusually specific? The more unique the original, the harder it is to explain away a matching “coincidence.”
- What do neutral observers say? Industry reporting, critics, and (sometimes) courts provide context beyond fan wars.
Conclusion
The funny thing about “copycat movies” is that they can accidentally become a discovery engine. You watch the
mainstream hit, then tumble down a rabbit hole and find a brilliant anime, a French comedy, or a forgotten short
film that deserved a bigger audience all along. If you take anything from this list, let it be this: when a story
feels suspiciously familiar, treat it as a treasure map. The original might be weirder, sharper, and more fun than
the shiny version you saw first.
Bonus: 500-ish words of real-life viewer experiences with movie “déjà vu”
Here’s a surprisingly common experience: you fall in love with a movie you think is wildly original, and for a
while you walk around recommending it like you personally discovered fire. Then, months later, someone casually
says, “Oh, you mean like that older thing?” And suddenly your confidence deflates like a birthday balloon
meeting a ceiling fan.
Another classic scenario is the “reverse watch.” You start with the famous versionmaybe a big American remake
and it hits exactly right. Later you watch the earlier, lesser-known work, and your brain does the cinematic
equivalent of zooming in on a clue. You notice the same emotional pivot, the same character dynamic, the same
“this is the part where everything goes sideways” turn. It’s not that the newer work becomes bad; it’s that your
understanding of the creative lineage gets sharper. You stop seeing a single film and start seeing a conversation
across decades and continents.
Then there’s the group-chat version of this phenomenon: you and your friends argue whether something is homage or
theft with the seriousness of people negotiating a peace treaty. One person insists “there are only so many plots,”
another starts listing scene parallels like they’re reading off a grocery receipt, and a third says, “I don’t care,
it slaps.” Everyone is right in their own annoying way. Art is messy. So is influence. So is the human tendency to
pretend we invented everything we love.
My favorite version, though, is when the “original” isn’t even objectively betterit’s just different in a way
that makes you respect the craft. Sometimes the obscure work is leaner and stranger, because it didn’t have to
please four quadrants and a toy aisle. Sometimes the mainstream version is smoother, with better pacing and
performances, because money buys time and talent. Seeing both is like comparing a sharp indie band demo to the
studio album it accidentally inspired: you hear the raw idea and the polished execution, and you learn what gets
gained (and lost) in translation.
If you want to turn this into a fun habit, try a “two-watch rule” whenever a movie feels familiar: watch the
blockbuster, then watch the earlier work people compare it to. Don’t do it like a prosecutordo it like a tourist.
Ask: what did the newer version keep, what did it change, and why? You’ll start spotting patterns in how stories
travel: how a Japanese psychological thriller can echo through an American awards film, how a French comedy can
become a Hollywood hit, how a short film can quietly seed an entire genre wave. It’s the same feeling as finding a
song sample you’ve heard your whole lifesuddenly the culture makes more sense, and it’s honestly kind of magical.
